IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

......Appellant vs.

SEEMA RANI AND ORS.

......Respondents Reserved on:- 06.02.2026 Pronounced on:- 10.03.2026 Uploaded on:- 12.03.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Gurinder Singh Brar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5.

None for respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J .

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 29.04.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, SAS Nagar, Mohali (for short, 'the Tribunal’) wherein, the appellant/insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to the claimants/respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to the tune of Rs.85,27,827/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, on the ground of quantum of compensation to be on higher side.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sake of b