IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHMANDAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT OPERATIVE PART UPLOADED ON RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED PRONOUNCED OR ON FULL
25.02.2026 10.03.2026 FULL PRONOUNCED 11.03.2026 Sukhmandar Singh ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. R.S. Bains, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sarabjot S. Cheema, Advocate for the appellant(s).
Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu, Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent-NIA.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
AND RC No. Dated Police Station Section
19/2020/ 05.04.2020 National 124A, 120-B IPC and 13, 16, 17, NIA/DLI Investigation Agency 18, 20 of the UAPA Act Bail Application number before the Sessions CIS No. BA/2678/2024 Court CNR No. PBSA01006534-2024 Date of Decision 03.10.2024
1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of regular bail by the Special Judge, NIA, Punjab vide order dated 03.10.2024, the appellant had come up before this Court by filing the present appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.
2. In paragraph 17 of the appeal, the appellant declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.