SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5965

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MEHAR SINGH ETC. – Respondent


3. Aggrieved, defendant No.1 has filed the present appeal.

4. For the sake of clarity, the par(cid:29)es shall be referred to as per their status before the trial Court. The trial Court record available on DMS has been perused carefully.

5. Subject ma(cid:11)er : Present lis pertains to land measuring 17 Bigha

12 Biswa situated in village Dhindsa, Tehsil, Rajpura, detailed in the plaint.

6. Chronological Events : In order to appreciate the controversy, the relevant events are tabulated chronologically:

7.1 Factual Matrix : As will be evident from above table, the controversy between the par(cid:29)es has a long and somewhat chequered history. Hakam Singh (defendant No.2) was originally the owner of land measuring 60 bigha 01 biswa situated in village Dhindsa, Tehsil Rajpura. The land in dispute, measuring 17 bigha 12 biswa, formed part of the said holding. On 04.04.1977, Hakam Singh suffered a decree in favour of his wife, Smt. Charan Kaur (defendant No.3), whereby she became owner of the en(cid:29)re land measuring 60 bigha 01 biswa. ThereaDer, on 12.06.1979, Smt. Charan Kaur entered into an agreement to sell the suit land measuring 17 bigha 12 biswa in favour of the present plain(cid:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top