SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6060

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
POONAM & ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:23.02.2026 Date of decision:05.03.2026 Uploaded on: 07.03.2026 KULDEEP AND ANOTHER ...Appellants Versus POONAM AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pratyush Sood, Advocate and Ms. Diksha Mahajan, Advocate for the appellants.

Ms. Vandana Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.5-Insurance Company (through VC)

HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J.

1. The questions involved in the present appeal are as under:

1. “Whether a driving licence to drive a tractor with the gross weight of 2110 kilograms requires a separate endorsement under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 specifying that the driver can operate “Transport Vehicle”?

2. “Whether a trailer or trolley attached with the tractor requires separate insurance to cover the liability in a motor vehicle accident?”

2. The owner and driver of the tractor-trolley have assailed the correctness of the Award dated 17.12.2014, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sonepat, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') whereby, the owner and driver of the tractor-trolley have been fastened the liability and r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top