SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6091

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GIAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
SAWAN RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3522 of 2006 (O&M)

Date of Decision: February 27, 2026 Gian Chand ... Appellant Versus Sawan Ram ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present:- Mr. Rohit Singh and Mr. Navita Singh Dinarpur, Advocates for the appellant.

Mr. Amanjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate for the respondent.

********

RAMESH KUMARI, J.

1. The instant regular second appeal has been filed filed by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘the plaintiff’) seeking to challenge the judgment and decree dated 17.08.2006 passed by first Appellate Court whereby, the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated

16.02.2005 passed by the trial court dismissing the suit, has been dismissed.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit seeking permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendant (hereinafter referred to as ‘the defendant’) from interfering in the reserved passage (rasta-khas) connecting the house of the plaintiff, shown as red in the attached site plan Ex.P-8 and for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to reconstruct the wall A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top