IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DECIDED ON: 18.02.2026 SONU .....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.
Present: Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner ***
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Prayer
1. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying or the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the speaking order dated 14.10.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2, in compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP- 18628-2021, whereby the representation dated 20.08.2024 (Annexure P-3)
submitted by the petitioner, has been rejected.
Brief Facts
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Peon on 12.07.2018 under Outsourcing Policy-II after participating in a selection process conducted pursuant to advertisement dated 29.04.2018 issued for filling six vacant posts of Peon in the Prosecution Department. The petitioner successfully cleared the written test conducted on 24.06.2018 and joined the post after selection. Subsequently, on
23.01.2019, the services of the petitioner were terminated on the ground that regular recruitme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.