SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
REHMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
SUBHAN KHAN AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:14.01.2026 Rahmuddin (since deceased) through LRs ... Appellant Versus Subhan Khan (since deceased) through LRs and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Aditya Vermani, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Mohammad Sabir, Advocate Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate Mohd. Parvej, Advocate and Mr. Injamam-ul-Haque, Advocate for the respondents. (cid:1) (cid:1) *****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-defendant against the judgment and decree dated 17.05.1996 passed by the learned 1st Appellate Court whereby the appeal preferred by him against the judgment and decree dated 25.10.1994 passed by the learned trial Court, decreeing of the respondents-plaintiffs, has been dismissed while upholding the aforesaid judgment of the learned trial Court.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are being described in the manner in which they were before the learned Trial Court.

3. In brief, the facts are that the plaintiffs instituted a civil suit for specific performance on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 26.08.1988, whereby the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top