IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122)

CR-2355-2025 Date of Decision: - 30.04.2025 Raj Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Meena Kumari and another .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Ivan Singh Khosa, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the impugned order dated 15.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh vide which the application for staying warrants of possession in execution has been rejected.

2. On 21.04.2025, this Court was pleased to pass the following order: -

“Inter alia contends that the petitioner would vacate the premises within a period of one month from today subject to the decision in the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and has prayed that in case the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by the petitioner is allowed then the petitioner be given right to restitution of the said premises. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay the entire arrears of rent. It is submitted that the petition