SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9427

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 15.05.2025 Mukesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present criminal writ petition has been preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 seeking quashing of particulars dated 31.01.2025 issued by Divisional Commissioner, Division Karnal, District Karnal whereby petitioner has been granted the temporary release on parole for a duration of 10 weeks on the condition of him ₹

suffering two surety bonds of a sum of 2,00,000/- each.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that the petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Caste community, and is a Below Poverty Line (BPL) individual with no surviving parents or spouse. In fact, he has a minor daughter, who is presently studying in 11th standard. Further, the petitioner possesses no substantial immovable property, except for a small ancestral house in his village. In light of this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top