SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANJAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BIKRAM SINGH MAJITHIA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SANJAY SINGH …Petitioner(s)

Versus BIKRAM SINGH MAJITHIA …Respondent(s)

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 10.03.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 27.03.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 27.03.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or Full whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not Applicable reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Nikhil Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. D.S. Sobti, Advocate and Mr. Sultaan Singh Sangha, Advocate, Mr. Savpreet Gujral, Advocate and Mr. Bhavesh Puri, Advocate for the respondent.

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.

The petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr. P.C.), for setting aside the order dated 25.02.2021, Annexure P-10, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, whereby the petitioner’s application seeking permission to summon judicial file of the case titled State v. Jagjit Singh alias Jagjit Singh Chahal, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, Central Bureau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top