SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL ALIAS NANNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.265 CRM-M-12622-2026 Decided on : 25.03.2026 Sahil @ Nannu ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ***

Present : Mr. Arpandeep Narula, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

***

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL , J (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.556 dated 30.10.2025, registered under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 (Section 117(2)

of the BNS, 2023 added later), at Police Station Civil Lines, District Sirsa.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner alongwith co-accused armed with sword and dattar caused several injuries to the complainant and also inflicted kick and fist blows to him. Hence the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further contends that the petitioner has no concern with the said offence. He further conten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top