SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DHARAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on:25.03.2026 Dharam Singh …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Satya Veer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-

Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police Station Petitioner No.

(s)

Dharam 1190 25.07.2025 21(1) of Mines and HSENB, Ambala Singh, aged Minerals about 41 (Development and years Regulation) Act, 1957 and 303(2) of BNS

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner on 01.09.2025 following was recorded:

“1.xxx

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the tractor bearing registration No. HR 32G 0791, along with its attached trolley, was seized by the Mining Department on the allegation that it was being used for transporting sand. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that the vehicle was, in fact, being used for the religious pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top