IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Tekan ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 23.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 25.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 25.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full
4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not
5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Himani Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
***
MANISHA BATRA, J :-
The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 252 dated 14.08.2022 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341 and 506 of IPC (Sections 307 and 302 of IPC added later on) at Police Station Nathu Sarai Chopta, District Sirsa.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of the statement recorded by complainant-Roshni Devi, alleging therein that on the evening of 13.08.2022,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.