SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Manpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 23.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 25.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 25.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the complainant.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J :-

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 451 dated 23.07.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC and Section

24 of Immigration Act at Police Station 32-33, Karnal.

2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint made by Mohan Garg, alleging that about two years back, he came into

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top