SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
MANPREET SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (126)

CM-4538-CII-2020 CM-5790-CII-2026 in/and FAO-1491-2020 (O&M)

Date of decision:- 25.03.2026 Sushil Kumar Mishra and others ...Appellants Versus Manpreet Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Rehan Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Harpreet Pal Singh Bunger, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

CM-5790-CII-2026

1. Present application has been filed under Order 41 Rule 19 read with Section 151 CPC for restoration of the above-mentioned appeal.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The order dated 13.03.2026 is recalled and the main appeal is restored to its original number.

CM-4538-CII-2020

1. Present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 343 days in filing the present appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the delay of 343 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

FAO-1491-2020

1. The widow,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top