Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:24.03.2026 Suresh Kumar …Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. J.S Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
***
N.S.Shekhawat J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned judgment dated 07.09.2012 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Bathinda and the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.09.2011, passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda, whereby the petitioner was ordered to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 16(1) (a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and was sentenced as under:-
Under Section 16(1) (a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act
R.I for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for a period of 01 month.
2. Dr.Ashok Monga, Food Inspector filed a complaint under section
16(1) (a) (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act against petitioner Suresh Kumar on the allegations that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
