IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: March 24, 2026 Gram Panchayat Vill. Chuliana, Tehsil Sampla, District Rohtak through its Sarpanch ...Petitioner Versus Surajmal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

04.11.2024 passed by learned trial Court, whereby, an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, filed at the instance of the petitioner (who is defendant No.1 before learned trial Court), was dismissed.

The essential facts, to be noticed, are as follows:-

That, the plaintiffs-respondents No.1 to 6 had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they together with proforma defendants are exclusive owners in possession of the agricultural land measuring 10 Kanal 16 Marla, as detailed in the headnote of the plaint, copy whereof is Annexure P-1 and also sought that they are entitled to get their names entered in column of ownership of jamabandi and other revenue record, on the basis of the proprietary rights, having vested in the plaintiffs and proforma defendants, in view of Section 3