IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 24.03.2026 KASHMIR SINGH ...Petitioner Versus BALWINDER KAUR AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate, for the respondents.

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 20.09.2016, Annexure P-4, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana, in Criminal Complaint No.COMI/34809/2013 dated 19.07.2011, under Sections 494, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, vide which application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 Cr.P.C., for summoning the concerned Clerk, Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh, alongwith r ecord, was dismissed, as also t he order dated 27.03.2018, whereby revision thereagainst stands dismissed being not maintainable.

2. Learned counsel contends that the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., was filed by the petitioner to summon the said witness alongwith record at the pre-charge stage, he being relevant for decision of the case, which was rejected on account of the fact that he was not named in the list of the witnesses and the revision challeng