SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY @ VIJAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (346)

Date of decision: 24.03.2026 Vijay @ Vijay Yadav …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Kuldeep Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana.

****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J. (Oral)

The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.40 dated 20.11.2025 under Sections 7, 7A, 13(1)(B) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at Police Station ACB, Gurugram.

2. The present FIR came to be registered at the instance of Amandeep and reads as under:-

It is submitted that I, Amandeep S/o Vimal, resident of Village Rambas, Tehsil Kanina, District Mahendergarh, am a student of B.A. IIIrd Year. My father has been ill for many days. For household needs in the year 2024, my father had taken a loan on our house from India Shelter Bank, Nimrana (Rajasthan).

Now due to further financial needs, my father has taken a higher loan on our house from UTKARSH Bank. The previous loan was entered in the bank record, which was required to be remove

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top