SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
RAJ SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4786-2016 (O&M)

Date of decision: 24.03.2026 Kuldeep and others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Raj Singh ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for the applicant/respondent. Mr. Gobind Dhanda, Advocate for the non-applicant/appellants.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-8566-C-2023 This is an application under Section 151 CPC filed by the applicant/respondent for vacation of status quo order dated 04.12.2019;

and fixing the actual date of hearing in the main Appeal.

2. Heard.

3. In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/respondent, instant application is allowed; and the main case is taken up on Board today itself.

RSA-4786-2016 (O&M)

Present Second Appeal has been filed by the appellants/defendants against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent, for permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff had filed the present suit against the appellants seeking relief of permanent injunction res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top