SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HEMPREET SINGH SEKHON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH DECIDED ON: 24.03.2026 HEMPREET SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh Randhawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lachhman Singh and Ms. Harmeet Kaur, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.

The order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexure P-2), hereinafter being referred to as ‘impugned order’, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Ludhiana, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, is under challenge in the present petition. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’ only.

2. By virtue of abovementioned order, the learned trial Court while holding a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 427 of Indian Penal Code, has declared the petitioner to be a proclaimed person.

3. In nut-shell, the facts emerging from record are that the petitioner was facing a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Section 279, 337, 338 and 427 of Indian Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top