SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9645

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 Suman --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL.

Present:- Mr. Sahil Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rakesh Jangra, AAG, Haryana.

***

H.S. GREWAL.J (Oral)

This petition has been filed under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail for the petitioner in case FIR No.139 dated 09.05.2024 under Sections 302, 34, 120-B, 216 IPC, Sections 25(1-B)(a), 27, 29 of Arms Act and Sections 42, 45 of Prison Act, registered at Police Station City Jhajjar, District Jhajjar.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with co- accused Rohit @ Guddu had caused death of one Anuj by fire arm injuries. It is submitted that the petitioner had accompanied the main accused, who had shot Anuj dead along with co-accused.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations against the petitioner are false and concocted and the petitioner has not committed any offence. Moreover, petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2024 in the present case and thus she has und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top