SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ KUMAR @ SHANKAR @ KAKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7483-2026 Date of Decision:-24.03.2026 RAJ KUMAR @ SHANKAR @ KAKU ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana.

***

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in this petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.373 dated 08.11.2024 (Annexure P- 1) registered under Sections 22 and 29 (added later on) of the NDPS Act at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala, Haryana.

2. The brief facts of the case are that recovery of 177 strips (total 1416 capsules) of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus capsules containing salt Dicyclomine Hydrochloride Tramadol Hydrochloride & Acetaminophen Capsules carrying eight capsules each came to be effected from Shiv Kumar. He disclosed that he was to deliver the contraband to Raj Kumar @ Shankar Kaku (petitioner).

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He contends that the name of the petitioner figured in the disclosure statement of his co-accused. Pursuan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top