SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


220 (1st case)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH Krishan ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana ….Respondent Date of Decision: March 24, 2026 Date of Uploading: March 24, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) (earlier Section 438 Cr. P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case bearing FIR No.281 dated 12.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 22(C), 29, 61 of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station City Palwal, District Palwal, Haryana.

2. The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the petitioner is an accused of being involved in an FIR pertaining to NDPS Act involved alleged recovery of 15 injections of Buprenorphine 2 ML each, 15 injections of Diazepam 2ML each and 06 injections of Avil from co-accused, namely, Harender. Said co-accused, in his disclosure, named co-accused, namely Udaybhan to be a person from whom Harender had purchased the recovered injections. Further,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top