SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 Jaspreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Dheerja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of award dated 13.09.2017 to the extent Victim Compensation Committee, Fazilka (for short ‘Committee’) has awarded compensation of Rs.25,000/-.

2. The petitioner suffered 50% permanent disability due to an accident on 24.02.2017. An FIR No.37 dated 27.04.2017 was registered under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of IPC at Police Station Sadar, Abohar, District Fazilka. The FIR was cancelled following untraced report. He filed application dated 22.05.2017 before the Committee. The said application was allowed and Committee vide award dated 13.09.2017 awarded compensation of Rs.25,000/-. The petitioner claims that as per Punjab Victim Compensation Scheme, 2017, he is entitled to higher amount of compensation.

3. On being asked reason of inordinate delay, learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top