SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KEWAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent



##PAGE1##

CRM-M-15141-2026 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

221 CRM-M-15141-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.03.2026

ASI Kewal Singh ...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present : Mr. SPS Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Payal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab.

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.12 dated 15.01.2026, registered under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended by PC Amendment Act, 2018), at Police Station City Malout, District Sri

Muktsar Sahib.

2. Learned Senior counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 2 months and 5 days. Neither any amount was demanded nor received by him. The amount of Rs.1,00,000/- that has been deposited in the account of third party namely Gurbinder Singh who has not been named as an accused. Challan was presented on 12.03.2026, charges have not been framed

and in all there are 25 PWs. He is not involved in any other case.

3. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner who was working as ASI in Police for

ASHOK KUMAR

2026.03.24 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE2##

CRM-M-15141-2026 (O&M) 2

having accepted bribe from the driver of the vehicle which was involved in the accident. However, she is unable to controvert with regard to custody, stage and

petitioner being not involved in any other case.

4. Heard.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular that the petitioner is in custody for 2 months and 5 days; not involved in any other case; challan stands presented on 12.03.2026, charges are yet to be framed and there are total 25 PWs, the trial is likely to take a considerable time, further incarceration of the petitioner would be violative of his right enshrined under

Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the present petition is allowed.

6. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following

conditions:-

(i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a

specific order of Court.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for

commission of which he is suspected of.

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any

manner.

(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty.

(vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid,

ASHOK KUMAR

2026.03.24 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE3##

CRM-M-15141-2026 (O&M) 3

it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.

(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the

petitioner.

7. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as

granted to the petitioner by this order.

8. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are lim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top