SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JITENDER @ JEETU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jitender @ Jeetu ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 18.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 24.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 24.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate and Mr. Karan Duggal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

None for respondent No. 2.

Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No. 3.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘the SC/ST Act’) by the appellant challenging the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), whereby an application filed by him under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top