SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGIR SINGH ETC. – Appellant
Versus
DAVINDER SINGH ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH Court OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jagir Singh and another . . . Appellants vs.

Davinder Singh and others . . . . Respondents Reserved on: March 18, 2026 Pronounced on: March 24, 2026 Pronounced fully/opera5ve part : Fully * * * *

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Argued By:- Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the plain ffs against the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court, whereby the suit filed by them for declara on and permanent injunc on, which had been decreed by the trial Court vide judgment dated 26.03.1992, came to be reversed and dismissed vide judgment dated 09.08.1996.

2. For the sake of convenience, the par es are being referred to as per their status before the trial Court. The record of the Courts below, available on DMS, has been perused.

3. The plain ffs are the sons of the sole defendant Saudagar Singh. Their case, as set up in the plaint, is that the suit property was inherited by their father from his predecessor Gurdit Singh and, therefore, it assumed the character of ancestral coparcenary property. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top