IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 23.03.2026 MUKHTAR SINGH ....Petitioner Versus PRITAM SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Chetan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure P1) passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, vide which the evidence of the plaintiff/petitioner has been ordered to be closed.

2. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as it would only delay the proceedings and cause unnecessary expenditure to the respondents.

3. Before proceeding further, the impugned order dated 13.11.2025 is reproduced as under:

“No PW is present. Previous cost not paid. Perusal of file revealed that plaintiff has availed numerous effective opportunities but failed to conclude his evidence. As such no further adjournment is justified and evidence of plaintiff is closed by order. Now to come up on 20.11.2025 for evidence of defendant, subject to three effective opportunities.”

4. I have heard