SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9732

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

205 (2 cases) CRM-M-49774-2025 &

CRM-M-24214-2025 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026 VINOD KUMAR ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL.

****

Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rahul Sidher, Advocate for respondent No.2 in both cases.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Both the abovementioned petitions are being decided by a common order since the same arise out of same complaint case.

2. The instant petitions have been filed by the petitioner under Section 483(3) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 in both cases namely Narender Singh Jangra and Nathu Ram by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fatehabad vide orders dated 29.03.2025 and 30.07.2025 respectively passed in Criminal Case bearing No.COMI-35 of 2023 dated 19.09.2023 titled as ‘Ramphal and another Versus Nathu Ram etc.’ pending in the Court of learned JMIC, Tohana.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the private respondents No.2 in connivance with other accused persons namely Bhupe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top