SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
POOJA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SURENDER JAGLAN AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:23.03.2026 Pooja and others .…Appellants Versus Surender Jaglan and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Ravi Ambawata, Advocate for the appellants.

NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-6566-CII-2025

1. Prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with section 151 CPC is for condonation of delay of 75 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

2. Heard.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and delay of 75 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

FAO-2063-2025

1. The appellant-claimants have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation amount of ₹21,66,000/- awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul (for short-‘the learned Tribunal) vide impugned Award dated 20.09.2024, passed in petition bearing MACP No. 67-2021 dated 05.03.2021 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Out of the total awarded compensation of ₹21,66,000/-; 10% was deducted towards contributory negligence; thereby granting compensation of ₹19,49,400/- to the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top