IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

204 Civil Revision No.3672 of 2018 Date of decision: March 23^rd, 2026 Ram Agya .....Petitioner Versus Moj Nath and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 26.04.2018 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandigarh, whereby the application filed by respondents No.1 to 3 for permission to examine handwriting expert in rebuttal evidence had been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a perusal of Annexure P-3 would show that the issues in the present case were framed on 16.05.2016 and the said issues are reproduced hereinbelow:

“Present: Sh. Harsh Tandon, Advocate for the plaintiff. Sh. Rajeev Gupta, Advocate for defendants no.1 and 2.

Defendants no.3 to 5 already exparte Ms. Sonia Garg Advocate, for the defendant no.6. Sh. Rajeev Gupta, Advocate for defendant no.6A.

Replications to the written statements of defendants no.1 &

2. def