01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 19.01.2026.

Pronounced on: 23.03.2026 POONAM MAHANT ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr. Deepinder Singh Virk, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J .

1. By virtue of this petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court has been, invoked by the petitioner, for setting aside the order dated 12.09.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, hereinafter being referred to as impugned order. The impugned order is a common order passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, hereinafter being referred as ‘revisional court’, with regard to three revision petitions.

2. In nut-shell the background of the case is that, that with regard to dispute qua possession of the property in dispute, the proceedings under Section

145/146 Code of Criminal Procedure, hereinafter being referred to as Cr.P.C. were taken up and in the