IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PANKAJ KHURANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7883-2025 DECIDED ON: 23.03.2026 PANKAJ KHURANA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Jagpal Singh, Advocate, for Mr. A.S. Sivia, Advocate, for the complainant.
SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.186, dated 15.11.2024, under Sections 408, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana.
2. After hearing the submissions addressed by counsel for the petitioner, on 11.02.2025, following order was passed:- “2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that FIR has been complainant in the FIR is M/s Patanjali Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. and the petitioner is merely working in the company as its employee since the year 2019. He has no connection as beneficiary with the amount, which is allegedly transferred from the complainant – Company’s account to 4/5 other companies account i.e. (i) S.S. Foods Industries [(payment made accused No.3 through ba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.