SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9821

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PANKAJ KHURANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7883-2025 DECIDED ON: 23.03.2026 PANKAJ KHURANA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Jagpal Singh, Advocate, for Mr. A.S. Sivia, Advocate, for the complainant.

SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL)

1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.186, dated 15.11.2024, under Sections 408, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana.

2. After hearing the submissions addressed by counsel for the petitioner, on 11.02.2025, following order was passed:- “2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that FIR has been complainant in the FIR is M/s Patanjali Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. and the petitioner is merely working in the company as its employee since the year 2019. He has no connection as beneficiary with the amount, which is allegedly transferred from the complainant – Company’s account to 4/5 other companies account i.e. (i) S.S. Foods Industries [(payment made accused No.3 through ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top