SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9834

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (109) CRM-M-23084-2025(O&M)

Date of Decision:- 23.03.2026 HIMANSHU JOHAR ……Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present: Mr. Shubham Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

(through VC).

Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab.

Ms. Sanchi Bindra, Advocate for the complainant.

****

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed seeking the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 to the petitioner in FIR No. 14 dated 04.03.2025, registered under Sections 316(2) and 85 of the BNS, 2023 at Police Station Women Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana.

2. Vide order dated 10.03.2026, this Court, while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail, directed the petitioner to join the investigation.

3. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that his custodial interrogation is no longer required.

4. However, learned counsel for the complainant submits that despite being granted multiple opportunities, the petitioner has failed to cooperate in the recovery of the dowry articles.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top