SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Monu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 18.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 23.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 23.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J :-

The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 625 dated 16.09.2025 registered under Sections 115, 126, 3(5) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) (Sections 311, 190 and 191(3) of BNS added and Section 3(5) of BNS deleted later on) at Police Station Sadar Gurugram, District Gurugram.

2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top