SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANITA SANAN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

232 Date of decision : 20.03.2026 Anita Sanan and others ...... Petitioners versus Pawan Kumar and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Mandeep Singh Sachdev, Senior Advocate with Ms. Mehar Sachdev, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Nandini Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

None for respondents No.2 to 4.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. Present revision petition is directed against order dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P-1) whereby application filed by the plaintiff seeking amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 stands dismissed, holding that the proposed amendment, if allowed, shall amount to change in the nature of the suit.

2. Plaintiffs filed suit seeking decree of declaration to the effect that they are co-owners/co-sharers to the extent of 1/4 share in the suit property as detailed out in the headnote of the plaint, left behind by Bhim Sen son of Kundan Lal and Premwati wife of Bhim Sen. After notice was issued, defendants filed written statement propounding Will dated 31.08.2022 and Transfer Deed dated 29.06.2021 in their favour by Bhim Sen and Premwati re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top