IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANGI LAL BISHNOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M No.65113 of 2025 -1-
212
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.65113 of 2025
Date of Decision: 04.02.2026
Mangi Lal Bishnoi ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
***
Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab.
***
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.
1. Present petition has been filed praying for the grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.136, dated
30.11.2024, under Sections 15/22/29 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at
Police Station Khuian Sarwar, District Fazilka, Punjab.
2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that the police party,
while on patrolling on 30.11.2024, received a secret information to the
effect that Mangi Lal (petitioner) brings intoxicant tablets and Poppy
Husk from Rajasthan and selling the same in Punjab. It was informed that
he was coming from Rajasthan on his truck bearing registration No.RJ-
19-GB-8879 and in case of barricading, he could be apprehended along
with the contraband. On receiving the secret information, the barricading
was laid. In the meantime, a truck, as disclosed in the secret information
RITTU
2026.02.06 18:16
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CRM-M No.65113 of 2025 -2-
was seen coming from the side of Ganganagar. However, on suspicion,
the same was stopped. On asking, driver of the truck disclosed his name
to be Mangi Lal. He was suspected to be carrying some contraband in the
truck and thus, the search of the truck was conducted. On conducting the
search of the truck, 8 cartons and 3 gatta/bags were recovered, and, on
conducting the search of the same, 1,71,500 intoxicant tablets of
Tramadol Hydrochloride and 14 Kgs of Poppy Husk were recovered. He
failed to produce any licence regarding the conscious possession of the
same, thus, the FIR was registered and he was arrested on the spot. The
samples taken were sent to the FSL. On registration of the FIR, the
investigation commenced. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner
approached the Court of learned Judge, Special Court, Fazilka praying
for the grant of anticipatory bail. However, after hearing both the sides
and finding no merit in the same, the learned Judge, Special Court,
Fazilka declined the bail application filed by the petitioner vide order
dated 14.10.2025. Hence, being aggrieved, the petitioner is before this
Court by way of filing the present petition praying for the grant of
anticipatory bail.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
petitioner has been falsely and frivolously implicated in the present case.
He has submitted that the alleged recovery has been effected in the
present case from the public place, however no independent witness has
been joined. He has submitted that there is a violation of mandatory
provisions of Section 42 of NDPS Act. He has further submitted that
RITTU
2026.02.06 18:16
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CRM-M No.65113 of 2025 -3-
there is a violation of mandatory provisions of Section 50 of NDPS Act
as well in conducting the search. He has submitted that the petitioner has
no criminal antecedents as he has never been involved in any other case.
He has submitted that no prima facie case as alleged is made out against
the petitioner and thus, she deserves to be granted anticipatory bail.
4. Learned counsel for the State, however, has opposed the
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. She has
submitted that there was a specific secret information received regarding
the petitioner. She has submitted that on due compliance of provisions of
NDPS Act, the recovery of 1,71,500 intoxicant tablets of Tramadol
Hydrochloride and 14 Kgs of Poppy Husk was effected from the
petitioner, which is commercial in nature and thus, the provisions of
Section 37 of NDPS Act are attracted. She has further submitted that the
petitioner is involved in two more cases, i.e. FIR No.152, dated
25.07.2010, under Section 283 IPC, at Poli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.