SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAROOP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :08.01.2025 Saroop Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) :

Petitioner (Saroop Singh) has prayed for the following substantive relief:-

“Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ especially in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent State Government to refund the amount of the petitioner which has been lying deposited with the respondents since May 2017 for the Quarry namely Khanpur Khadar, District SAS Nagar, for which the petitioner was the successfully bidder and the work for which has not been started yet as the said quarry is having no connectivity from any side and further the quarry is under the active water channel of River Ghaggar from which the mining cannot be done and the auction of the said quarry has been done in violation of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Deepak Kumar Versus State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top