225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.01.2025 NARENDER KUMAR ...PETITIONER V/S JAI PARKASH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Parul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Tarun Yadav, Advocate for the respondent.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. This revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 22.01.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, vide which, judgment of conviction dated 15.05.2024 and order on quantum of sentence dated 19.05.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon in a complaint case filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NI Act’) have been upheld.

2. The petitioner was sentenced as under:

3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner/accused had taken a loan of Rs.5,00,000/- from the complainant and towards the refund of the same accused has issued cheque no.395803 dated 28.02.2013 for Rs.5,00,000/- (Five lacs only) in favour of c