IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JYOTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203 CRM-M-37054-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.01.2025 JYOTI ....Petitioner(s)
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present : Mr. J.S. Mohri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.
Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR as under:
FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 66 23.06.2023 419, 420, 384, 506, 201 and Shimlapuri, District
120-B IPC; Police
66(C), 66(D) of the Information Commissionerate Technology Act, 2000 Ludhiana
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such interim bail granted to the petitioner may be confirmed.
3. Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the Investigating Officer of the case has intimated that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for any custodial investigation in this case nor she is required for further investigation.
4. Heard.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.