SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JYOTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

203 CRM-M-37054-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.01.2025 JYOTI ....Petitioner(s)

Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present : Mr. J.S. Mohri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.

Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)

By way of present petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR as under:

FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 66 23.06.2023 419, 420, 384, 506, 201 and Shimlapuri, District

120-B IPC; Police

66(C), 66(D) of the Information Commissionerate Technology Act, 2000 Ludhiana

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such interim bail granted to the petitioner may be confirmed.

3. Learned State counsel, on instructions received from the Investigating Officer of the case has intimated that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for any custodial investigation in this case nor she is required for further investigation.

4. Heard.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top