IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 25.11.2024 Pronounced on: 13.01.2025 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI .....PETITIONER VERSUS NO. 3972738M EX L/NK SUBHASH CHAND AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Argued by: Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Advocate for the petitioner/UOI.

****

SURESHWAR THAKUR , J .

1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners herein- Union of India, prays for the setting aside of the order dated 09.05.2023 (Annexure P-1), as passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal concerned, wherebys the claim of respondent No.1 for the grant of service element of the disability pension for the service rendered by him in Defence Security Corps (DSC) has been allowed, by condoning the shortfall of 11 months and 23 days from the requisite 15 years of qualifying service for earning service pension in the DSC.

Factual Background

2. Respondent No. 1 was enrolled in the Indian Army on 22.10.1974 and was discharged therefrom on 31.10.1996. Respondent No.1 was granted retiring pension, as admissible to him as per the Pension Regulations. Thereafter, respondent No.1 was re-enrolled into Defence Security Corps (DSC service) on 24.04.1997. According to the prevalent policy, upon attaining the age of superannuation, respondent No.1 was discharged from service in the DSC on 30.04.2011 after rendering a service of 14 years and 07 days, which was short by 11 months and 23 days, so as to make the soldier enabled to complete the qualifying term of 15 years, for the purpose of grant of service pension, thus for the second service rendered by him in the DSC.

3. Respondent No.1 was denied service pension by the competent authority for his not completing the requisite qualifying period for earning service pension in the DSC.

4. Feeling aggrieved, respondent No.1 filed O.A., before the learned Armed Forces Tribunal concerned, wherebys he cast a challenge to the afore said rejection order. The said O.A., became allowed vide order dated 09.05.2023. The operative part of the said order is extracted hereinafter:-

xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx “ Accordingly, we accept the present application and direct the Union of India to decide the case of the applicant in terms of Smt. Shama Kaur's case (supra) within four months from today and pay the due and admissible amount to the applicant within the same period. In case the respondents fail to make the payment to the applicant within the stipulated period, the applicant shall be entitled to recover interest also @ 8% per annum on the arrears from the date of this order till realisation. However, the arrears so accrued shall remain restricted to three years preceding the date of filing of this O.A., That is, 09.11.2022.”

5. Feeling aggrieved from the aforesaid order as passed upon the O.A. (supra), by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal concerned, the petitioner-Union of India has filed thereagainst the instant writ petition before this Court.

Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits, that the learned Tribunal has failed to consider that in terms of Regulation No.125 of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 and Regulation No.44 of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, thus only the Competent Authority was empowered to condone the deficiency in the rendition of qualifying service, thus by the soldier for his becoming entitled to seek the endowment of pension to him. The said Regulations are extracted hereinafter.

(PENSION REGULATIONS FOR ARMY, 1961)

125. Except in the case of (a) an individual who is discharged at his own request, or (b) an individual who is eligible for special pension or gratuity under Regulation 164, or (c) an individual who is invalided with less than 15 years service, deficiency in service for eligibility to service pension or reservist p