IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VISHNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
210 Decided on: 14.01.2025 Vishnu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Arpandeep Narula, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
33 07.12.2023 Cyber Crime, 379 & 420 IPC (180 & 120-B District Hisar IPC added subsequently)
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 14 of the bail petition, the accused declares that one more FIR is pending against the petitioner.
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply dated 06.12.2024, filed by the State, which reads as follows:
“3. That briefly the facts of the case are that on 02.10.2023, a complaint was filed by the complainant namely Naresh Kumar resident of District Hisar on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (hereinafter referred as NCCR Portal), wherein it is stated by the complainant that on 28.09.2023, he received a call from mobile No. 96410-xxxxx and the caller informed the complainant that his na
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.