IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) CWP No. 6900 of 2021 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 24.01.2025 Chand Singh ...Petitioner Versus The Punjab and Haryana High Court At Chandigarh and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the respondents.

***

Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)

1. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner is that the claim of the petitioner is for the grant of pay in the pay ₹ ₹ ₹

scale of 10300 - 34800 + Grade Pay of 3200 which was admissible to the post of Stenographer Grade-III, has been declined by modifying the appointment order of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner competed for the post of Stenographer Grade-III and was ultimately selected and granted the appointment dated 11.05.2012 on ad-hoc basis in the Session ₹

Division of Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar in the pay scale of 10300 -

₹ ₹

34800 + Grade Pay of 3200 + DA with the clear condition that the petitioner will be given the minimum of the pay scale along with Dearness Allowances. Learned counsel for the pe