IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

117 CWP-1955-2025 Date of Decision: 24.01.2025 Vidya Sagar …Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders dated 13.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) and 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-10) whereby respondent has declined to count his service for the purpose of pension.

2. The petitioner joined Haryana Agro Industries Corporation Limited (for short ‘HAICL’) in 1976. He retired from the office of HAICL on 31.03.2000. Prior to that he had worked for about 10 years with one common facility workshop of Industrial and Commerce Department, Haryana. The job with Industrial and Commerce Department was pensionable, however, job with HAICL was non-pensionable. The petitioner after his retirement started litigation against respondents. This Court vide order dated 18.11.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP No.9807 of 2014 directed the respon