SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SONIKA MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Reserved on: 14.1.2025 Date of Decision: 24.1.2025 Sonika Mahajan @ Palak ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Argued by: Mr. R.S.Bains, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Aarushi Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

****

SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks the quashing of the order dated 12.12.2024 (Annexure P-3), passed by respondent No. 3, wherebys the application moved by the petitioner in compliance of the order dated 16.10.2024 (Annexure P-1) for regularizing the allotment of Flat No. 28FF- Block-C, Nirmal Shaya Apartment, Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, became declined, thus on the ground that the petitioner has failed to show any document with regard to her continuous possession for the last 12 years over the said property.

Submissions of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner

2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner has argued, that earlier the petitioner had preferred CWP No. 14120 of 2024, before this Court, thus seeking the issuance of d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top