IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 24.01.2025 Earndeep Kaur @ Irandeep Kaur and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mukul Goyal, Advocate and Mr. Kewal Krishan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Yuvraj Singh, AAG Punjab.

None for respondent No.2.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J.

1. The present petition has been preferred by the accused, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.0041 dated 03.11.2023 (hereinafter to be referred as the impugned FIR) registered under Sections 306/34 of IPC at Police Station GRP, District Patiala, Punjab as also proceedings subsequent thereto on the basis of compromise deed dated 11.03.2024 (copy whereof has been appended as Annexure P-2 with the present petition).

2. The gravamen of the impugned FIR is that the complainant namely Shakuntla Singhi w/o late Baldev Krishan, R/O H. No. 212-A, Gurdeep Colony, Street No. 02, Ablowal, District Patiala, aged 62 years alleged that she is a homemaker and residing at the aforesaid address. She further alleged that her marriage with late Sh. Baldev Krishan took place in the year 1979 and we had two children; elder daughter namely Ritu Singhi being married to Naresh Batta of Rajpura and her younger son namely Manish Singhi being married to Irandeep Kaur of Tripri, Patiala, 11 years ago. However, on account of COVID-19, their younger son namely Manish Singhi passed away in the year 2021, leaving behind a seven year-old son. After death of the Manish, the complainant stayed with my daughter-in-law namely Irandeep Kaur and grandson. However, the behavior of her daughter- in-law towards the complainant and her husband was often staying aloof and she often disrespected them. On multiple occasions, she brought one Rupesh Kumar, an unrelated man, to the house of the complainant. When the complainant confronted her, she used abusive language and claimed ownership of the house. On 25.10.2023, the daughter-in-law of the complainant namely Irandeep Kaur locked herself in a room with the aforesaid Rupesh Kumar. On 26.10.2023, when she was confronted by the family members, she stated that this was her house and asked the complainant to leave. She also sold the car of her late son and had ₹

transferred 80 lakhs from his account to her account without sharing any details thereof with the complainant. It was further alleged that, on 31.10.2023, the aforesaid Rupesh Kumar began installing cameras in the house without the consent of the complainant and her husband. Upon protest, both the accused i.e. her daughter-in-law namely Irandeep Kaur and Rupesh Kumar insulted the complainant and her husband and told us to leave or die. These events caused immense stress to the husband of the complainant. On 02.11.2023, overwhelmed by the harassment and mental torture, the husband of the complainant attempted suicide by jumping in front of a train at Rajpura Railway Station whereinafter he was admitted to PGIMER, Chandigarh where he succumbed to his injuries on the same day. The complainant has further alleged that her daughter-in-law namely Irandeep Kaur and Rupesh Kumar were responsible for the death of her husband on account of the mental harassment and humiliation caused by them. Based on these set of allegations, the impugned FIR was got registered.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners have been falsely implicated into the impugned FIR whereinafter the Police has even put up the challan (final report) on 04.05.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that a compromise was entered into between the petitioners and the FIR-complainant (wife of the deceased) on

11.03.2024, relevant whereof reads as under:-

“1. That in the above said FIR now the matter has been settled with the intervention of respectables and all the misunderstandings have been cleared.

2. That it has settled between the parties that