IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

CR-357-2025 Date of decision : 28.01.2025 Gurmeet Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus Pardeep Singh Bhangu and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Divanshu Jain, Advocate, Mr.Minkal Rawal, Advocate, Mr.Abhinav Goel, Advocate and Mr.Arjun Sangwan, Advocate for the caveator-respondent no.1.

VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)

INDEX Paragraphs Pages

1 Challenge in the revision petition 1 1 to 2

2 Brief facts of the case 2 2 Grounds of challenge raised on behalf of the 2 to 3

3 petitioners 3 Analysis and finding regarding Ist Ground- (i) 4 to 9 3 to 8

4 The respondent no.1-landlord is not an NRI Analysis and finding regarding IInd and IIIrd 10 to 19 8 to 17 Grounds -(ii) The respondent no.1-landlord is not the owner of the entire property and is only owner upto the extent of 25% and thus, is not entitled to seek eviction.

(iii) There is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioners and the

5 respondent no.1.

Analysis and finding regarding IVth Ground- 20 to 25 17 to 21 (iv) The requirement projected by the

6 respondent no.1 is not bonafide.

CHALLENGE IN T