SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 28.01.2025 Rajeev Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. T.S. Attariwala, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant.

****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral)

1. Through the instant petition, filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.359 dated 19.09.2023 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120-B of the IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar.

2. In the instant case, the FIR (supra), was registered on a complaint made by one, Gagan Singla. The relevant extract, which has been culled out by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, while declining the regular bail application, is extracted hereinafter :-

“7. As per the case of the complainant, accused Sanjeev and Rajeev (petitioner) entered into agreement to sell dated 04.06.2021 for selling their 15K 15M of land. They had received an amount of Rs.2 Crores in cash and more then Rs.1 Crore 70 lakhs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top