SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARNAILO DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SHAM LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: January 28, 2025 Karnailo Devi ......Appellant Vs.

Sham Lal and others ......Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Balraj Singh and Mr. Ravinder Bangar, Advocates, for the appellant.

Mr. Karan Gaba, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate respondent-Insurance Co.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J .

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 06.06.2009 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 read with Section 141 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation granted to the appellant/claimant, whereby the claimant-appellant was awarded Rs.1,05,817/- on account of the injuries suffered by her in the motor vehicular accident, which occurred on 17-08-2008.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case are not reproduced for the sake of brevity.

SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSELS FOR THE PARTIES

3. The learned counsel for the claimant-appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top